google.com, pub-9997829944419860, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
Tech

A drone flyer got a fine for flying near an airport

A drone flyer got a fine for flying near airport

A drone flyer got a fine for flying near an airport. A person who operated a drone close to an airport. To capture videos of a music festival from the air have been told to pay around £1,500 as a penalty.

In easier terms, someone who used a drone near an airport to record a rock concert. From above has been instructed to pay about £1,500 as a punishment.

a drone flyer got a fine for flying near airport
Drone flying to record the festival

A drone flyer got a fine for flying near an airport Daniel Cesare used a drone to record the Download festival at Donington Park. Which is close to East Midlands Airport. This was a problem because the park is in an area where drone flights are restricted due to its proximity to the airport.

Additionally, he flew the drone higher than the legal limit of 400 feet (122 meters). He flew it so far away that he couldn’t see it anymore.

Daniel Cesare, who is 36 years old and lives in Spondon, Derby, admitted to breaking seven rules.

a drone flyer got a fine for flying near airport
Download festival

These include:

  1. Flying a drone in a restricted area near an airport without permission. 2. Going above the allowed height for drone flights. 3. Losing sight of the drone during flight. 4. Not displaying the required registration number on the drone.

A drone flyer got a fine for flying near an airport In simpler terms, Daniel Cesare flew his drone to record a music festival. But he did so in a place where drones weren’t allowed because it’s near an airport. He also made the drone go higher than it should and flew it so far that he couldn’t see it anymore. He admitted to breaking seven rules, which include flying in a restricted area. Going too high, losing sight of the drone, and not displaying the required registration number. He’s ordered to pay a penalty for these actions.

He requested the court to consider 13 more drone-related offenses during his sentencing. At South Derbyshire Magistrates’ Court. This means that he wanted the court to take these other offenses into account when deciding his punishment.

Cesare admitted that he didn’t know about the rules and laws about drones. He mentioned that he should have done more research, as flying drones was a new hobby for him.

But, Magistrate Guy Wildgoose disagreed and said that not knowing the laws is not an excuse. He mentioned that Cesare was flying his drone in the area of Weston-on-Trent and Shardlow. Which is quite close to East Midlands Airport. He believed that Cesare must have realized the airport was nearby.

a drone flyer got a fine for flying near airport
Download festival ground

As a consequence, Cesare was fined £1,008. This amount was lowered from £1,512 due to his guilty plea. He was also told to pay more costs of £85 along with a surcharge of £403.

In simpler terms, Cesare told the court he didn’t know the rules about drones. But the court didn’t accept that as an excuse. The court believed he should have been aware of the rules. Especially because he was flying near an airport. As a result, he was fined £1,008 and he had to pay extra costs of £85 and a surcharge of £403.

Cesare admitted he lacked awareness of drone regulations. explaining that drone flying was a new hobby for him. But, Magistrate Guy Wildgoose disagreed, stating that not being informed about the laws isn’t a valid defense. Wildgoose pointed out that Cesare operated his drone near Weston-on-Trent. The Shardlow, is close to East Midlands Airport, suggesting he must have been aware of the airport’s vicinity.

So, Cesare received a fine of £1,008, reduced from £1,512 due to his guilty plea. He was also mandated to cover more expenses: £85 in costs and a surcharge of £403.

In simpler terms, Cesare acknowledged not knowing the drone rules, blaming his new interest in drone flying. Yet, the magistrate didn’t agree, emphasizing ignorance isn’t an excuse. The magistrate highlighted that Cesare had flown his drone. Near an area close to East Midlands Airport, implying he should have known better. As a result, Cesare was fined £1,008 (lowered for admitting guilt), plus had to pay extra costs of £85 and a surcharge of £403.

Police officers visited Cesare’s location and confiscated his drone and mobile phone.

Upon examining the data on his devices. They discovered that he had engaged in illegal drone flying the previous day as well.

During that particular flight, Cesare had launched his drone from King’s Mill Lane. A spot near Weston-on-Trent in Derbyshire. He flew the drone over a considerable distance of 841 meters and at an altitude of 1,637 feet (499 meters).

As a consequence, the magistrates not only imposed a fine on Cesare. But also made the decision to seize and drop his phone and drone.

In simpler terms, the police came to Cesare’s place and took his drone and phone. When they looked at the data on these devices, they realized he had flown the drone the day before too. During that flight, he had launched the drone from a location near Weston-on-Trent and flown it quite a distance away at a high altitude. The court not only fined Cesare but also decided to take his phone and drone and destroy them.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button